Comments on: The Shack – Book Review

By: devourerofbooks

devourerofbooks — Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:36:33 +0000

Different people read for different reasons. I think it is equally valid to read for the story or message or to read for the quality of the writing. It really all just depends on what a reader is looking for. With that in mind, it can be very helpful to comment one way or another on the quality of the writing. Poor writing does not mean that the book is worthless, but it does mean that some people may not be able to appreciate the message if they read primarily for style. I would also say that I do not think that good writing is the same as being “high-brow.” I enjoy a good deal of genre fiction that is certainly not “high-brow,” but I still prefer for the writing to be solid, at the very least.

By: Julie

Julie — Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:33:00 +0000

Having read The Shack twice, I have to say I’m really disappointed to read those who commented about the quality of the writing. Why does everything have to be “high-brow”` to be worthy of attention. Personally I found it a great read, a beautiful story which left me feeling happy and peaceful. My father who is a Church of Scotland minister also says that it is theologically sound. Why not read it just to enjoy it and not be so snobbish about “quality”. I believe we should all read a variety of genres. Who knows it may change your perceptions!

By: Kristy

Kristy — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:00:55 +0000

Thanks for all your wonderful reviews. I have this book in my to be read pile.

By: Literary Feline

Literary Feline — Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:51:02 +0000

This isn’t a book I have any real interest in reading, I admit, but I have enjoyed reading the discussions by those who have read it. It seems to spark quite a range of emotions and ideas–from those who love it to those who hate every word, and everything in between.

By: Alyce

Alyce — Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:09:18 +0000

I’ve heard pretty much the same thing from other reviewers that I trust. That it was interesting, but with mediocre writing.

By: Staci

Staci — Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:24:43 +0000

I really didn’t care for it….

By: Steph

Steph — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:16:31 +0000

I’m all for authors using literature as a means of exploring religious ideas should they so choose, but I have read a more explicit/detailed summary of the plot of this book, and it was so ridiculous and far-fetched that I would never be able to take it seriously, I’m pretty sure. Also, the bad writing would be a deal breaker as well.

And I realize this book is totally different in terms of its scope, but I can’t help feeling The Shack looks like a Nicholas Sparks novel should he venture into the horror/thriller genre.

Pass.

By: Michele

Michele — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:13:06 +0000

I picked up a copy from our library sale, but didn’t make it past the first chapter or so. It irritates me that such mediocre writing can make it to the top of the bestseller lists, while more worthy books get ignored by the reading public!

By: Amy @ My Friend Amy

Amy @ My Friend Amy — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:23:10 +0000

Ugh, I haven’t been able to read this b/c I’ve heard so much bad stuff about the writing. I have a hard time with poor writing. But I’m glad that it’s been a source of healing for a lot of people. That’s the best a book can do!

By: Shana

Shana — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:40:51 +0000

Jen- This is our book club pick for February. I’m gonna wait to read your review. Hopefully I’ll remember to come back when I’ve finished it. And hopefully you liked it.