I’ve pretty much been reading for the last two hours straight, pausing only to microwave leftover Thai food (yes, pad kee mao is sort of an odd breakfast, I know) and constantly reset the wireless router.  My internet seems to be going out pretty regularly.  I’ll reset it and it will work for about 5 minutes, so I haven’t visisted anyone else yet.  Maybe that’s good, though, I got so distracted seeing what everyone else was doing last time, that I got a lot less read than I had hoped. 

I think a nap may be coming in the next couple of hours.  I didn’t sleep all that well last night and I’m not going to be doing any caffeine today, so I already know I won’t be reading the WHOLE 24 hours.  I’m sort of hoping that if I take enough 30-45 minute naps I can stay up later tonight, though.

 

So far I haven’t finished anything, but I’m 345 pages through “Breaking Dawn,” by Stephenie Meyer.  It isn’t as bad as I thought it would be based on some people’s reviews.  Perhaps reading all of the books within a month and a half or so (and just reading “Eclipse” yesterday) actually helped my enjoyment.  I didn’t have time (and really didn’t care enough either, but that’s a different story) to wonder constantly what was going to happen next.  That plus some luke-warm reviews kept me from building up the next installment of this supernatural soap opera.  

 

Back to reading!  If my internet stays on, I’ll try to visit some of you in the next hour.

 

I didn’t even set an alarm this morning, but my body must have known it was time for the read-athon, because it woke up a nice 15 minutes before the start (allowing me to start not TOO late, since I still had to write this post).  I’m starting on the couch with my pile of books, because my husband is nowhere near ready to wake up and it is too dark to read in our room without turning on a light.  I’ve got a nice pile of books to keep my company, though!

010 225x300 picture

I still haven’t figured out where I’m starting.  ”Descartes’ Bones” is one that I need to just go ahead and finish, but I think I’m going to save that until I’m in the groove more.

In case you hadn’t heard about the read-athon until RIGHT NOW and want to join, click the picture of the woman reading in my sidebar to be taken to the information page.  If you simply want to follow along with what others are doing in the read-athong, check out http://gargantuanbooks.blogspot.com/, a feed of all of the readers’ latest posts.  

Happy Reading!

 

living biblically pictureThe Year of Living Biblically by A.J. Jacobs

A.J. Jacobs is a secular Jew living with his secular wife in (largely) secular New York.  A.J. began to wonder, however, if his was missing out on something with this whole religion thing.  So many people seemed so into it, after all.  Particularly after the birth of his first son, A.J. began to wonder what exactly would ground his son in the future, or help him to grow up to make good choices.  So A.J. decided he would follow the Bible – the ENTIRE Bible – for a year.

I had read A.J.’s previous book, “The Know-It-All” about reading the entire Encycopedia Britanica in a year, so I expected a fun read, filled with obscure facts, this time about the Bible.  Well, I did get that, but I got so much more as well.  It was really fascinating to read about A.J.’s spiritual journey throughout the year and see how trying to follow the rules of the Bible – which necessitated really trying to UNDERSTAND the Bible – changed A.J. for the better.  It came across not just in the story he was telling, but the way he wrote as well.  I have to admit, I got a little teary towards the end as well.

“The Year of Living Biblically” is fun and spiritual, with irreverant reverance and reverant irreverance.  I think this could be enjoyed by all, religious or not.

Buy this book on Amazon.

 

balloons2 pictureballoons2 pictureThe prize summary of the 100th Review Giveaway!

Before I tell you who won, let me give you some numbers.

149 people entered this contest, with a total of 455 entries (from posting on blogs and commenting on reviews).  That’s an average of just over three entries per person.  Kathy of Bermuda Onion and Word Lily had the most entries with 14 each.  Surprisingly (and sadly), this didn’t translate to wins for either of them.

By far the two most popular books were “The Guernsey Literay and Potato Peel Society” and “Sarah’s Key,” with 42 and 40 requests, respectively.  “The Last Queen,” “The Other Queen,” and “Sweetsmoke” came in next around the high 20s and low 30s.  “The Gifted Gabaldon Sisters” got a surprising 7 requests, given that it was added late.  Even the book added very last, “Months and Seasons” had at least one person going back and making it her new choice (plus the late-comers who chose it).

Now, we didn’t quite make 150, so I am not adding a 9th winner.  However, there were so many people with so many entries, that I am adding an extra copy of two books: “Sarah’s Key” and “The Best Place to Be”.  The 5th and 6th place winners will each get 2 books instead of only 1.

The winners:

First, let me tell you how I selected the winners.  I put everyone’s name, email address, number of entries, and book choices in an excel spreadsheet (I will delete it, along with all your email addresses after I notify the winners, it was just the only way to ever find your contact information easily).  Once they were all in and final, I alphabetized, then numbered everyone based on the number of entries.  The first person might be 1 through 5, the second 6 through 7, etc.  I then asked random.org’s random interger generator for 8 intergers between 1 and 455.  Reading right to left then top to bottom the numbers were:

279, 247, 285, 358, 264, 62, 241, 90

Those numbers correspond to:

MJ of Creative Madness
Mari of Mari Reads
Natasha of Maw Books (probably good karma from the huge awareness and fund raiser she did for Darfur)
Shelly of Write for a Reader
Melody of From One Idealist to Your Mother
Caite of Caites Day at the Beach (I didn’t lose yours Caite!)
Margie
Donna of LibrarysCat

I will try my best to give you all at least ONE of your choices.

I’ll be emailing each of you (well, maybe not Melody), to get your addresses.

Those of you who didn’t win, check out my current contest for a copy of Alive in Necropolis!

 

btt pictureOkay–here was an interesting article by Christopher Schoppa in the Washington Post.

Avid readers know all too well how easy it is to acquire books — it’s the letting go that’s the difficult part. … During the past 20 years, in which books have played a significant role in both my personal and professional lives, I’ve certainly had my fair share of them (and some might say several others’ shares) in my library. Many were read and saved for posterity, others eventually, but still reluctantly, sent back out into the world.

But there is also a category of titles that I’ve clung to for years, as they survived numerous purges, frequent library donations and countless changes of residence. I’ve yet to read them, but am absolutely certain I will. And should. When, I’m not sure, as I’m constantly distracted by the recent, just published and soon to be published works.

So, the question is his: “What tomes are waiting patiently on your shelves?

To attempt to answer this question, the first thing I did was go to my LibraryThing catalog and scroll through everything tagged TBR.  Here are some books I recognized have been on my shelf unread for quite some time:

  • S.: A Novel of the Balkans by Slavenka Drakulic – I bought this book when I was wait-listed for a class on Europe after WWII in college.  I never got into the class, but I kept all of the books, as they looked interesting.  I think this is the only one (other than the textbook) that I haven’t read yet.  It is about war and rape, and I’ve never managed to put myself in the right mood to read it.
  • Wilson’s Ghost: Reducing the Risk of Conflict, Killing, and Catastrophe in the 21st Century by Robert McNamara – I got this off of a bookstore bargain table at some point during college and have yet to touch it.
  • Ballad of the Whiskey Robber: A True Story of Bank Heists, Ice Hockey, Transylvanian Pelt Smuggling, Moonlighting Detectives, and Broken Hearts by Julian Rubinstein – Like Wilson’s Ghost, this was on a bargain table.  Probably the 3 for the price of 2 table at Borders.  Also acquired in college.
  • The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life by Michael Schudson – I’m pretty sure that my mom gave this to me in high school.  Haven’t cracked it yet.

I probably have more, but they aren’t on my shelves.  They are on the shelves in my old bedroom in my parent’s house.  I never had room for them in college, and there was a limit to how many books I could fit around my other stuff in my car to get from California to Chicago.  Every so often when I visit I take another suitcase full home, but usually I brought so many books WITH me to read that my luggage was already at the limit.

Maybe I can smuggle some back with me at Christmas.

What books have been in YOUR TBR pile forever?

 

the fire pictureThe Fire by Katherine Neville

Oookay, I’m not totally sure what to say about “The Fire.”

This is a sequel to Neville’s earlier book “The Eight,” which I have not read and which I definitely SHOULD have read before attempting “The Fire.”  The storyline of both books centers on The Game, in which real people are analagous to chess players as they attempt to discover the missing pieces of a mystical ancient chess set which once belonged to Charlemagne and is imbued with ancient Middle Eastern wisdom.

The story line was very engaging, but at the same time almost totally lost me.  I was also a bit annoyed by the main character, Alexandra.  She had no foreknowledge of The Game at all, even the fact that it existed, until the beginning of the book.  This kept her from being able to figure out what on earth was going on without a good deal of help, but she seemed to leap to realizations suddenly and with undue ease.

That being said, I think that part of my issue was not having read “The Eight” yet and I’m not sure I can give “The Fire” a completely fair review.  I have requested “The Eight” from someone on Bookmooch and, when I get a chance, I’ll read both books and perhaps even re-review this one.

Please don’t read this until you have read “The Eight.”  I hear “The Eight” is terrific though, so perhaps you can join me in a read of both books!

Buy “The Eight” on Amazon. picture

Buy “The Fire” on Amazon. picture

 

I read “Alive in Necropolis” at the beginning of June and really enjoyed it.  I ended up sending a link of my review to the author, Doug Dorst, and we have been emailing sporadically ever since.  I am very pleased to share with you all a guest post from Doug, as well as a giveaway of two copies of “Alive in Necropolis.”  See the bottom of this post for giveaway details.

necropolis1 picture

First off, my thanks go out to Jen for inviting me to guest-blog. Her review of Alive in Necropolis was the first one that I encountered from a reader, and it meant (and means) a lot to me. After working on the book for so long, it’s been gratifying to find out that people are getting some enjoyment out of it. Especially people who aren’t related to me and thus aren’t obligated to like it.

How long did it take? Eight years and then some. Longer still, if you count the year that I spent trying to write this thing as a short story, which, considering what a big, sprawly thing it turned into, seems very obviously absurd. Even though many of my friends are writers and dispensers of good advice, I had to make a lot of mistakes on my own—often twice or more. Example: I was on page 300 before I realized the book needed to be in present tense, not past. And that was one of the smaller mistakes…

Anyway… the book has been out for a few months now, and it’s gotten some really nice exposure—far more than I had allowed myself even to hope for. I’ve been very fortunate—it’s a tough market out there, with a lot of really good books competing for a dwindling supply of attention and resources.

I asked Jen what I should write about, and she gave me a few ideas:

o why you chose to write “Alive in Necropolis,”

o authors/stories that have influenced you,

o some things I’ve been reading.

So, here goes:

Why I chose to write this book:

I chose to write this book because my agent gently suggested that it was time to tackle a novel. Up until then, I had only written short stories (the publication of which, bless his heart, earned him 15% of damn-near-nothin’). I don’t know when I would’ve worked up the nerve to start a novel if I hadn’t had his support/reassurance/kicks-in-the-butt.

So: why Necropolis? As I said, I had been trying to write it as a short story, and it was resisting all of my attempts to keep it compressed. It seemed like it had the most legs of any of the ideas I had at the time, so I went with it. My agent then went out and sold the thing based on a few chapters and an outline. I blew through the advance almost instantaneously, and then I had no choice but to see the project through. (OK, I had some choices: I did contemplate faking my own death and moving to Costa Rica.)

The genesis of the story was a newspaper item that I read while I was in grad school in Iowa City: a kid had been left duct-taped to a tree in a local cemetery on a near-freezing night. He was found alive the next morning, barely, by a guy who was out walking his dog. I was interested in the kid’s story, obviously, but for some reason I knew I wanted to approach the material through the eyes of the guy who found him. This character didn’t become a cop until I had moved back to San Francisco, found out about Colma, and discovered that I had an acquaintance (now a good friend) who’d become a cop in one of the neighboring towns and who was a great storyteller. The more that I got into my research about Colma, the more I realized that it would be a shame not to invite some of the dead folks into the narrative. The dead-folks storyline could resonate with and support the primary narrative, and plus, if I was going to be having a long-term relationship with this project, I wanted to take any opportunity I could find to have fun with it.

Several years and nine hundred pages later, I had a first draft. The draft that you’ll be reading (or, in Jen’s case, have read) if you choose to accept this mission, is Draft #4, maybe 4-1/2.) Efficiency is not, and has never been, my forte.

Someone asked me if the story came to me fully formed. It didn’t. I had a few basic ideas about some characters and some events, but the writing process was very much a discovery process. That’s another reason it took so long—some characters and storylines came together easily, and some were really, really difficult to figure out. The first draft of the book served its purpose, but it would’ve been a terrible read—it’s painfully obvious when a writer doesn’t know his/her characters well enough and is forcing them through the narrative instead of letting them live on their own.

I also knew I wanted to work with the idea of a living cop attempting to police the dead, although it was not at all clear to me how (or if) that would work. Getting the two storylines working together in some balanced and engaging way was the most challenging part of writing this thing, and I was making fairly substantial changes that affected this balance right up until the deadline.

Authors/stories that have influenced me:

I’m a huge fan of T.C. Boyle. His novel World’s End also makes use of dead folks without being a ghost story in any traditional sense, and it’s one of the books that got me really fired up about writing. I also hold the wholly unoriginal belief that Gatsby is one of the best American novels ever. Other favorite novels: Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s One Hundred Years of Solitude, Peter Matthiessen’s Far Tortuga (which is brilliantly written and a ripping high-seas tale at the same time), and Thomas Williams’ The Hair of Harold Roux (which deserves to be a lot better known than it is these days). Among my favorite short-story collections are Denis Johnson’s Jesus’ Son, Tobias Wolff’s The Night in Question, and Adam Johnson’s Emporium.

While I was working on Necropolis, I read Stewart O’Nan’s The Night Country, which helped me find the tone I wanted, and Amanda Davis’ Circling the Drain, which reminded me that one has to keep taking risks when writing.

I don’t read much horror fiction these days, but I grew up reading a lot of Poe, Lovecraft, and Stephen King, and I’m sure their influences are in the book somewhere.

I could go on and on with this—the list of books I love is not a short one—but I gotta stop somewhere, I suppose.

What I’ve been reading (in between Freshman Comp papers):

- Lots of election coverage. Too much, probably.

- The View from the Seventh Layer by Kevin Brockmeier

- The 42nd Parallel by John dos Passos

- Best American Short Stories 2008

- Like You’d Understand, Anyway by Jim Shepard

- The Monsters of Templeton by Lauren Groff

Now, for the giveaway information!  Doug has kindly agreed to give away two copies of his book to readers anywhere in the world.  You can enter by leaving a comment below.  In the comment, you must write a tombstone epitaph for yourself (or, if that creeps you out, for a random person).  Doug will choose his favorite to win one copy of the book.  The other copy will be given randomly to one of the other entrants.  Entries must be in by 11:59 Central Standard Time on Wednesday, October 22nd.

 

tuesdaythingers pictureToday’s question: Early Reviewers- do you participate? How many books (approximately) have you received through the program? Have you liked them generally? What’s your favorite ER book? Do you participate in the discussion group on LT?

For about 6 months I was using LibraryThing to keep track of my books.  I was not very disciplined about it, though, and didn’t always remember to add new books; nor did I participate in any of the social aspects of LT.  One day in January of this year, however, I happened to pop onto LibraryThing for reasons no longer known to me, and saw on the ‘tools’ tab a note about the Early Reviewers program.

“Free books?!?” I thought, “free books that haven’t even been released yet? COOL!”

I needed to learn more about the program.  I read the FAQ page, of course, and signed up, but I also began ‘lurking’ in the Early Reviewers Group on Talk to see what people were saying.  This discovery of Talk led to a serious addiction to the LT message boards that still rages today.

I wasn’t chosen for a book that first month (I’ve got no idea what I selected), but I was lucky enough to be granted a book in the February batch.  Unfortunately that book, Holding Her Head High, wasn’t very good.  My next book, The Venetian Mask, was just okay.

Here’s the whole list of books I’ve received, in order (all titles link to my review):

  • Holding Her Head High – not good, I ditched the last quarter due to the repetitive nature and bad pseudo-history.
  • The Venetian Mask – mediocre.  Venice was by far the best-developed character, but it was at least a fairly entertaining read.
  • Franklin and Lucy – although the title is a bit misleading (Eleanor plays a MAJOR part, probably bigger than Lucy), this is an interesting history of FDR from the perspective of his relationship with the women in his life.
  • Two Brothers: One North, One South – honestly one of the worst books I’ve ever read.  I had to give up 45 pages in because the prose was just that painful (see my review for an example).
  • The 19th Wife – A fantastic book!  It became my favorite ER book to that point.
  • My Father’s Paradise - Another fantastic book!  And the author is awesome too, see what happened when I met him.
  • Sweetsmoke – A very well-done book about the life of a slave during the Civil War.  Loved it.
  • Tears of the Desert – It is hard to say that this book is so great to read, because it is very painful, but a very well-written memoir of a girl growing up in Darfur.

It is too hard to choose a favorite out of the last four, so I’m not going to.  I think that each of them was chosen as my favorite book of the month in the month I read them (Sweetsmoke actually tied with other books).  Actually, it looks like The 19th Wife got edged out by Monique and the Mango Rains, but it was close.

I keep a close eye on the Early Reviewer Group, particularly for the “the books are being added to the ER library!” threads, the “what are you getting this month?” threads, and the “what books have arrived” threads.  I do not participate as much as I used to, however, because much of the discussion centers around new people asking the same questions that have been answered many times, although if nobody else has answered, sometimes I’ll jump in and do so.  It is less that I am annoyed by the repetitive questions than that not much other discussion takes place, perhaps BECAUSE of the repetitive questions.  I do love the “ARC Junkies” group that blossomed out of a thread I started in the Early Reviewers Group.  Come to think of it, that might be why there’s so little conversation in ER these days, we moved it all to another group!

Have you participated in LibraryThing Early Reviewers or a similar program?  How have you enjoyed your experience?  What great books have you received that everyone should read?

 

Adventure in Borneo: The True Story of One Man’s Quest to Find the Bornean Peacock Pheasant

Jolan Durrah
ISBN 978-0-9817001-0-6
Reviewed by Jen Karsbaek for Reader Views (09/08)

Promising but Disappointing, 1 star

Dan loved birds. He was fascinated by them. He was particularly interested in pheasants, perhaps because he was never able to classify exactly what a pheasant was: “Pheasants are an odd group of birds that are loosely related and don’t quite fit anywhere else. For every one thing that they all have in common, there will always be at least one exception to the rule.” In his obsession with pheasants, Dan became aware of and particularly obsessed with one particular kind of pheasant: The Bornean Peacock Pheasant. With the death of the one living pair in the United States and no documented sightings in the wild since 1962, Dan felt that he needed to travel to Borneo to try and discover whether or not any Bornean Peacock Pheasants still existed.

“Adventure in Borneo” really had quite a bit of potential. It could have been both an exciting, adventure filled travelogue as Dan journeyed through the interior of the Bornean forest. At the same time, it could have been very informative and interesting dealing with pheasants in general and the different pheasants with which Dan comes in contact in particular.

Unfortunately, the book was simply not very well done.

There was no particularly bad grammar writing, but neither was there particularly good writing. The sentence structure and word choice were just not particularly complex or sophisticated. In the interest of attempting to be informative and cover everything, Durrah had a tendency to jump from topic to topic almost as if by stream of consciousness, which gave the book a very choppy feel. I felt as if there was no background as to why Dan is so interested in pheasants in general or the Bornean Peacock Pheasant in particular. Certainly it is not communicated to the reader why these might be subjects of interest. Interested he clearly is, though, because there is a good deal of discussion on the topic of pheasants that is not grounded in any background information and will go over the head of most readers. In addition, ‘adventure’ seems to be a bit of a misnomer for Dan’s journey, although I’m not sure if that is due to a lack of urgency in the writing or the actual nature of his trip.

If you are very interested in pheasants or Borneo you may enjoy this book; otherwise your reading time could probably be put to better use.

Buy this book on Amazon.

 

tss picture

For the second year in a row here in Chicago it feels like summer (about 80 degrees) in mid-October.  Hopefully this year everyone makes it through today’s Chicago marathon safely!

My sister and her friend are in town this weekend (as many of you know, my sister will be coming back again in a couple of weeks to actually LIVE here).  To celebrate the beautiful weather and the fact that her friend, Katherine, has never been to Chicago before, we went and walked around downtown all day yesterday.  Very nice, not very conducive to getting much reading done.  I did try to read my current book, “Descartes’ Bones” while we were on the ‘El’, but I’m quite stuck on it and being on the train didn’t help.  I kept looking out the window instead of at the page.  

I’m still not totally sure whether I want to finish “Descartes’ Bones” or if I’m just going to give it up, since I am having to push so hard to get through it.  In the interest of at least breaking it up with something more dynamic, I started “The Fire” by Katherine Neville last night.  

I’m hoping to get some good reading time in this afternoon, after church and after we unload my sister’s car.  Hopefully I can make it at least some portion of the way through ONE of these books, since they’re both being released on Thursday.  I may have to do my reading out on the porch, though, because it is gorgeous today!

 

Happy Sunday Salon!

© 2012 Devourer of Books Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha