<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Stupid Do You Have To Be&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/10/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/10/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be/</link>
	<description>Memoirs of a Ravenous Reader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:37:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry C.</title>
		<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/10/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-8599</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devourerofbooks.com/?p=507#comment-8599</guid>
		<description>I guess the little apple pictures was a little too sexual? hahahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the little apple pictures was a little too sexual? hahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mari</title>
		<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/10/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2692</link>
		<dc:creator>mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devourerofbooks.com/?p=507#comment-2692</guid>
		<description>Well, I guess they wanted a little publicity, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess they wanted a little publicity, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/10/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2663</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devourerofbooks.com/?p=507#comment-2663</guid>
		<description>My parents never really censored what I was reading as a kid probably because I was always mature for my age and reading books as quickly as I could get my hands on them. I guess I don&#039;t believe in censoring.  I don&#039;t think many junior high students would be reading these books anyways.  Most of the people I know who have read the twilight series are either in high school or older.  I don&#039;t think that the content is mature enough for junior high students but I believe it is more up to the parents whether or not they allow their kids to read these books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My parents never really censored what I was reading as a kid probably because I was always mature for my age and reading books as quickly as I could get my hands on them. I guess I don&#8217;t believe in censoring.  I don&#8217;t think many junior high students would be reading these books anyways.  Most of the people I know who have read the twilight series are either in high school or older.  I don&#8217;t think that the content is mature enough for junior high students but I believe it is more up to the parents whether or not they allow their kids to read these books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veens</title>
		<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/10/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2638</link>
		<dc:creator>Veens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devourerofbooks.com/?p=507#comment-2638</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t believe this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t believe this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/10/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2531</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 02:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devourerofbooks.com/?p=507#comment-2531</guid>
		<description>Most 12 year olds aren&#039;t INTERESTED in Twilight because most of them aren&#039;t interested in romance novels.  The ones that are interested are usually mature enough to understand it.  The later books might be a bit more confusing/intense for them, but, like any book that might concern a parent, this is all solved by the parent reading with the child.

Maybe these books should be with permission only or on a high shelf, but book banning, of course, is pretty silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most 12 year olds aren&#8217;t INTERESTED in Twilight because most of them aren&#8217;t interested in romance novels.  The ones that are interested are usually mature enough to understand it.  The later books might be a bit more confusing/intense for them, but, like any book that might concern a parent, this is all solved by the parent reading with the child.</p>
<p>Maybe these books should be with permission only or on a high shelf, but book banning, of course, is pretty silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icedream</title>
		<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/10/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2461</link>
		<dc:creator>Icedream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devourerofbooks.com/?p=507#comment-2461</guid>
		<description>Like it stated in the article, many school districts base the choice on the accepted reading level of the book, not necessarily the content.  I think it is really the only fair way to come up with a decision of what books to place in the library. What is the alternative? Leaving the choice to  one individual to decide whether the content is appropriate? (and in a lot of schools districts that is the situation)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it stated in the article, many school districts base the choice on the accepted reading level of the book, not necessarily the content.  I think it is really the only fair way to come up with a decision of what books to place in the library. What is the alternative? Leaving the choice to  one individual to decide whether the content is appropriate? (and in a lot of schools districts that is the situation)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladytink_534</title>
		<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/10/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladytink_534</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devourerofbooks.com/?p=507#comment-2451</guid>
		<description>Lol. Maybe if there is enough controversy more kids will want to read it. I agree, that isn&#039;t very smart to try to ban it now (or at all for that matter), especially since the movie is coming out this year too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol. Maybe if there is enough controversy more kids will want to read it. I agree, that isn&#8217;t very smart to try to ban it now (or at all for that matter), especially since the movie is coming out this year too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fyrefly</title>
		<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/10/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2436</link>
		<dc:creator>fyrefly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devourerofbooks.com/?p=507#comment-2436</guid>
		<description>Heh, that&#039;s true.  Meyers does spends a lot of &lt;i&gt;New Moon&lt;/i&gt; comparing Bella &amp; Edward to to Romeo &amp; Juliet - could make an interesting term paper, doing a real comparison (are ninth graders writing term papers yet?)

My problem is not even so much that it&#039;s a terrible set of behaviors, it&#039;s that this terrible set of behaviors (Edward being stalkery and emotionally abusive) are treated for the most part as charming and romantic and positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, that&#8217;s true.  Meyers does spends a lot of <i>New Moon</i> comparing Bella &amp; Edward to to Romeo &amp; Juliet &#8211; could make an interesting term paper, doing a real comparison (are ninth graders writing term papers yet?)</p>
<p>My problem is not even so much that it&#8217;s a terrible set of behaviors, it&#8217;s that this terrible set of behaviors (Edward being stalkery and emotionally abusive) are treated for the most part as charming and romantic and positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fyrefly</title>
		<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/10/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2431</link>
		<dc:creator>fyrefly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devourerofbooks.com/?p=507#comment-2431</guid>
		<description>To clarify, I don&#039;t necessarily agree with the decision to pull it from the junior high library; I just wanted to point out that there&#039;s a lot of implicit (and arguably necessary) censorship that goes on in school library collection planning, and I think this one case is a legitimately grey area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify, I don&#8217;t necessarily agree with the decision to pull it from the junior high library; I just wanted to point out that there&#8217;s a lot of implicit (and arguably necessary) censorship that goes on in school library collection planning, and I think this one case is a legitimately grey area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fyrefly</title>
		<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/10/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator>fyrefly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devourerofbooks.com/?p=507#comment-2429</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m opposed to banning books on general principles, but... there are edge cases, particularly when it comes to schools, and particularly when it comes to schools in places where there public libraries where motivated kids can get their hands on the books in question.  There are lines that I think most people would recognize are inappropriate - does &lt;i&gt;Twilight&lt;/i&gt; belong in a fourth-grade library?  A second-grade classroom library?  

This school official is not drawing the line where everyone else would, but I don&#039;t agree that thinking that a book is not age-appropriate for a certain group is necessarily the same thing as banning it outright.  She&#039;s not asking that it be taken from the high school libraries as well, right?  It&#039;s a parent&#039;s job to monitor and decide what&#039;s appropriate for their kids, but it&#039;s a school library&#039;s job to maintain a selection of age-appropriate books.  No one cries &quot;book banning!&quot; when school libraries don&#039;t include Harlequin romances.

And personally, yes, I think junior high *is* too young for the Twilight series (largely because I worry that young girls without the experience to know better might take Edward and Bella&#039;s relationship as models of acceptable behavior).  There might be students there who could understand it on their own, or with parental guidance, but those students can also find it at the public library, the bookstore, or from friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m opposed to banning books on general principles, but&#8230; there are edge cases, particularly when it comes to schools, and particularly when it comes to schools in places where there public libraries where motivated kids can get their hands on the books in question.  There are lines that I think most people would recognize are inappropriate &#8211; does <i>Twilight</i> belong in a fourth-grade library?  A second-grade classroom library?  </p>
<p>This school official is not drawing the line where everyone else would, but I don&#8217;t agree that thinking that a book is not age-appropriate for a certain group is necessarily the same thing as banning it outright.  She&#8217;s not asking that it be taken from the high school libraries as well, right?  It&#8217;s a parent&#8217;s job to monitor and decide what&#8217;s appropriate for their kids, but it&#8217;s a school library&#8217;s job to maintain a selection of age-appropriate books.  No one cries &#8220;book banning!&#8221; when school libraries don&#8217;t include Harlequin romances.</p>
<p>And personally, yes, I think junior high *is* too young for the Twilight series (largely because I worry that young girls without the experience to know better might take Edward and Bella&#8217;s relationship as models of acceptable behavior).  There might be students there who could understand it on their own, or with parental guidance, but those students can also find it at the public library, the bookstore, or from friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

