<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Queens of England &#8211; Book Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/03/queens-of-england-book-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/03/queens-of-england-book-review/</link>
	<description>Memoirs of a Ravenous Reader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:37:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kings and Queens of England: A Tourist Guide - Book Review &#171; Devourer of Books&#8217; Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/03/queens-of-england-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Kings and Queens of England: A Tourist Guide - Book Review &#171; Devourer of Books&#8217; Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devourerofbooks.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] British history and British royal history.  The last such book I read, Norah Loft&#8217;s &#8220;Queens of England&#8221; was very interesting in that it looked exclusively at Queens, whether they were regnant or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] British history and British royal history.  The last such book I read, Norah Loft&#8217;s &#8220;Queens of England&#8221; was very interesting in that it looked exclusively at Queens, whether they were regnant or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devourerofbooks</title>
		<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/03/queens-of-england-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>devourerofbooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devourerofbooks.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-36</guid>
		<description>She did a pretty good job hiding the agenda throughout almost the entire book.  I wouldn&#039;t have seen it either if I wasn&#039;t annoyed that there was so much about all of the recent queens when some of the older ones seemed so interesting!  I couldn&#039;t stop coming up with hypotheses for the reason for that and, well, this is what I came up with.  It is the history training, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She did a pretty good job hiding the agenda throughout almost the entire book.  I wouldn&#8217;t have seen it either if I wasn&#8217;t annoyed that there was so much about all of the recent queens when some of the older ones seemed so interesting!  I couldn&#8217;t stop coming up with hypotheses for the reason for that and, well, this is what I came up with.  It is the history training, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Literate Housewife</title>
		<link>http://www.devourerofbooks.com/2008/03/queens-of-england-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Literate Housewife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devourerofbooks.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-35</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing how two different people can read the same book and get different things out of them.  I read that book in an afternoon.  I didn&#039;t really see an agenda to it - until I read your review.  Of course it was there.  Well, I obviously saw the justification for Elizabeth II, but didn&#039;t really ponder on it.  I think that this might have been more of a sticking point for me if I hadn&#039;t seen The Queen.  Good review!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how two different people can read the same book and get different things out of them.  I read that book in an afternoon.  I didn&#8217;t really see an agenda to it &#8211; until I read your review.  Of course it was there.  Well, I obviously saw the justification for Elizabeth II, but didn&#8217;t really ponder on it.  I think that this might have been more of a sticking point for me if I hadn&#8217;t seen The Queen.  Good review!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

